Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Deb Branner's avatar

In this time of transition to who knows where and orwellian double meanings, your writing about raised questions of ordinary and emerging new circumstance feels familiar.

Ordinary seems like the most wonderful place to be. The sublime Ordinariness of mutual consent and cooperation for the benefit of all. Yet, new authoritarians threaten to hold the door any which way they want, your comfort be damned. Not polite at all.

Your poem gets right to the heart of that polite compact. But I confess, I was unsure about the reference to Seymour, Boleyn. So I took a dive... to be reminded of the line between Jane and Anne and how they each navigated Henry's royal whims. They each seem to have been true to their own selves.

Fascinating, how Ordinary gears shift, keep true.

Please do.

Thank you, Elizabeth.

Rita Ott Ramstad's avatar

I love the spareness of your poem, so fitting in a piece that asks us to think about what we withhold and why, especially in a cold season.

Your question about merging and driving makes me think of drivers in our city. Often, people are so set on being nice that they just make driving harder for all of us. I know other drivers probably regularly think I'm an a-hole because I insist on zipper merging, rather than diving into the long lane way way back like they did. If everyone would just zipper, that other lane wouldn't be so long and slow. I'm not a fan of performative niceness. (I always let one car in when it is their turn to merge.)

I'm thinking also of your question about arbitrariness. Most rules or norms are arbitrary, so I don't think it's arbitrariness that makes any of them bad or wrong. It's just that we want to have some order, so we can be calmer. I'm OK with that.

18 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?